top of page
Rugged.one (6).png

Getac vs. Axon: Which Body-Worn Camera is Right for Your Agency?

When it comes to body-worn cameras and in-car video solutions for law enforcement, two brands often dominate the conversation: Getac and Axon. Both offer feature-rich solutions designed to assist officers in the field, but when it comes down to rugged reliability, data control, and cost-effectiveness, there are some key differences agencies should consider.

Let’s break down how Getac and Axon compare, and which solution might be the best fit for your agency’s needs.



Durability & Ruggedness

Law enforcement professionals operate in demanding environments, and their equipment needs to keep up.

  • Getac: Designed with military-grade durability, Getac cameras and in-car systems are IP67-rated, meaning they are fully dustproof and can withstand submersion in water. They also exceed MIL-STD-810H standards, providing excellent shock and drop resistance.

  • Axon: While built for police use, Axon’s body-worn cameras do not meet the same high-level MIL-STD durability certifications as Getac. This can make a difference for agencies operating in extreme conditions.



Video Quality & Performance

Clear, high-quality footage can make or break an investigation. Both companies offer solid video quality, but there are differences.

  • Getac: Provides superior low-light performance, making it easier to capture clearer footage in nighttime or poorly lit environments. Wide field-of-view (FOV) options help capture more of a scene.

  • Axon: Offers standard video quality with respectable clarity, but struggles in low-light situations compared to Getac’s technology.



Data Storage & Ownership

One of the biggest concerns for agencies is who controls their video data and how much it costs to store and access it.

  • Getac: Offers flexible storage solutions with the choice of cloud-based or on-premise storage. Agencies own their data and are not locked into any forced subscriptions or hidden fees.

  • Axon: Uses a proprietary cloud ecosystem (Evidence.com) that requires agencies to pay ongoing fees for access. This can significantly increase the long-term cost of ownership.



Integration & Compatibility

Seamless integration with existing evidence management systems is crucial for workflow efficiency.

  • Getac: Designed for open-platform integration, allowing agencies to connect with their current evidence management systems without major overhauls.

  • Axon: Locks agencies into the Axon ecosystem, which may require switching to Axon-exclusive software solutions, increasing costs over time.


Cost-Effectiveness & ROI

When evaluating long-term costs, agencies need to consider hardware durability, software fees, and storage costs.

  • Getac: Offers a lower total cost of ownership with no hidden fees, forced cloud subscriptions, or unexpected costs. Agencies get more control over their budget.

  • Axon: While offering strong features, Axon requires ongoing licensing and subscription fees, which can add up quickly.


Final Verdict: Getac Takes the Lead

While Axon provides a well-known and widely used solution, Getac proves to be the smarter choice for agencies looking for rugged reliability, superior video quality, better data control, and long-term cost savings.


For government agencies looking to upgrade to a more durable and cost-effective video solution, Getac is the clear winner.


🔗 Looking to make the switch? Check out GovDirect—your trusted source for Getac video solutions.

 
 
 
bottom of page